The bar chart illustrates the amount of money that people in Asia, Europe, and the United States spent on various kinds of entertainment in 1995 and 2000.
Overall, people in these 3 continents spent more and more money on 5 types of entertainment over time, especially on publishing and television. In addition, the expenditure on the entertainment of people living in the USA was the highest while Asian spending was the lowest.
In 1995, Asian people charged 67 million on entertaining activities. The figure for Europe was 97 million and the highest one was 184 million spent by Americans. Similarly, in these 3 continents, publishing, television took up about 80% of the total expense while cinema, video, and music only accounted for the other 20%.
In the next 5 years, Asians spent nearly half a billion (47 million) more on amusing activities. People in Europe and America paid 131 and 257 million respectively. The American expenditure was the highest which doubled the Asian's. Besides, there was some slight increase in the payment on cinema, video, and music in some areas but not particularly noticeable (only 2-3%).
- The charts below give information about attendance at entertainment venues and admission prices to those venues in 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
- The maps below show a beachfront area in Australia in 1950 and today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The table below shows the sales made by a coffee shop in an office building on a typical weekday 78
- The graph below shows how money was spent on different forms of entertainment over a five year period Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below
- Some of the methods used in advertising are unethical and unacceptable in today s society To what extent do you agree with this view 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, similarly, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 949.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10215053763 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85372474875 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564516129032 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.8860697207 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167859461619 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0672554949587 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498132668654 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111766397682 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478234326504 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.