The graph below shows information about the recruitment of teachers in Ontario between 2001 and 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given illustration summarises details about the employment of two types of language teachers in Ontario over an interval from 2001 to 2007.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that the most significant change came from the English-language teachers category, while the figure for French-language teachers was almost unchanged throughout the period shown.
An in-depth look in the chart shows that in the year 2001, about 70 percent of French-language teachers were recruited, while the English-language teachers proportion was just a bit higher, about 72 percent. However, in the next two years, the rate of English-language teachers with regular teaching jobs decreased considerably by 32 percent. At the same time, the figure for French-language teachers underwent a slght drop to just over a half in 2002 then recovered immediately to nearly 70 percent afterwards.
It can be seen that from the year 2003 onwards, the proportion of French-language teachers with consistent teaching jobs fluctuated until 2007 when the category ended up to approximately 72 percent. Meanwhile, from 2003 to 2005, an upward trend was witnessed in the portion of English-language teachers. However, after a substantial fall in the next two years, merely 29 percent of teachers that teach English had jobs in schools and academies.
- The use of electronic media has a negative effect on personal relationships between people To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The media pay too much attention to the lives and relationships of celebrities such as actors singers or footballers They should spend more time reporting the lives of ordinary people instead To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people say that living in a high rise apartment block is a lonely experience because there is no community spirit Others say that people who live in high rise apartments have a much better sense of community than those who live in houses Discuss both 80
- The graph below shows how elderly people in the United States spent their free time between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The graph below shows how much money a city council gave to book clubs over a four year period summarise the information by selecting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1122.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42028985507 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34584921871 2.65546596893 126% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574879227053 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3827353767 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.25 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.875 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11489633662 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601158088296 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568024191401 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0917652537126 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544733580899 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.