The graph below shows the information on waste disposal in a European country from 2005 to 2008. Summarize information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.
The given column graph depicts the three methods of treating wastage in a European nation in four years.
Overall, it is clear that landfill is very popular method during first two years ;however, during 2008 dumping in the sea used most by the county. It can be seen that burning was less important method over given period.
To begin with, during 2005, most of the waste was disposed by using landfill method which was about 2000 million tonnes. It is interesting to note that equal amount of waste (800 million tonnes) was treated by burning during 2005 and 2008. The quantity of wastage which was treated by dumping and burning during first two years was 1200 million tonnes each.
Probing further, 1500 million tonnes and 1400 million tonnes of waste was disposed by landfill and dumping method respectively during 2006. Surprisingly, in the 2008 dumping in the sea was used at large level and nearby 1600 million tonnes of waste was treated via this method. Surprisingly, the amount of waste treated by landfill was 300 million tonnes less than dumping method in last year.
- The table below gives the information about students studying in six departments in an Australian university Summarise the information making comparisons where relevant 75
- Human activities have negative effects on plant and animal species. Some people think that it is too late to do anything about this problem. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- The natural resources such as oil and freshwater are being consumed at alarming rate What problems it can cause How can we solve this problem 85
- The picture below give the information about Eiffel Tower in Paris and an outline project to extend it underground. 78
- The picture below shows Bell Hill farm in 1976 and changes that took place in 2006 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparison where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 31, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The given column graph depicts the three methods of treating wastage i...
^^
Line 1, column 62, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h depicts the three methods of treating wastage in a European nation in four ye...
^^
Line 1, column 100, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng wastage in a European nation in four years. Overall, it is clear that lan...
^^
Line 3, column 103, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng first two years ;however, during 2008 dumping in the sea used most by the coun...
^^
Line 5, column 84, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...te was disposed by using landfill method which was about 2000 million tonnes. It ...
^^
Line 5, column 243, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ted by burning during 2005 and 2008. The quantity of wastage which was treated by...
^^
Line 7, column 114, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... disposed by landfill and dumping method respectively during 2006. Surprisingly, ...
^^
Line 7, column 167, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y during 2006. Surprisingly, in the 2008 dumping in the sea was used at large lev...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90760869565 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22196220058 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489130434783 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.9973543307 43.030603864 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.333333333 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0729339012347 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0427156685268 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0307513121013 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0520649767829 0.15604864568 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.020343183156 0.0819641961636 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.86 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.