The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.
The line chart gives information about the requirements sent to the Tourist Information Office in a particular city from January to June 2011.
In general, it can be seen that visitors going to the city made more inquiries in person and by letter or email, while telephones had a downward trend. The figure for inquiring in person had dramatically changed.
In January, telephone requests accounted for the highest numbers, at 900 inquiries, while the number of requests in person sent to the Tourist Information Office was twice as much as via letter or email. Over the next three months, the telephone remained the most common method, with 1000 inquiries. In addition, the number of sending in-person requests significantly increased and surpassed the figure for email and postal requirements.
From March to April, the number of people sending inquiries in person surpassed by telephone before hitting its peak at 1900 inquiries. After that, the period also recorded a significant rise to 1,600 in the figure for telephones. The number of senders through letter and email sharply decreased by nearly 400 inquiries in June.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-04 | brew | 65 | view |
| 2024-03-26 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-01 | euphorianmt | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-03 | leuleu28 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Đặng Ngọc Thanh Nhàn | 67 | view |
- The diagrams below show changes in Felixstone in the UK between 1967 and 2001 SAMPLE DOL 78
- 18 6 2016 Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport Why is it not popular in many places How can its popularity be increased 84
- The graph shows the amount of fossil fuel energy generated in Europe between 1981 and 2001 73
- The maps show how the industrial area will change into a housing area in the future 73
- The diagram shows how tea leaves are processed into five tea types 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 949.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21428571429 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77718311337 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587912087912 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6506347932 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.444444444 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151490117358 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0607288235862 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062678460835 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10248374089 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0736600268611 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.