The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph given illustrates how many requiries the Tourist Information Office situated in a city received over six months in 2011.
It is clear from the graph that people were prone to enquire personally. In addition, despite undergoing fluctuations, all the figures generally increased, except the decline witnessed in the number of individuals requiring via email/letter.
In january, there were exactly 800 people prefering to use telephone to inquire, whereas the numbers of by email/letter and in person were drawfed by that of telephone, at 600 and approximately 400 in turn. To March, the figure for in person went up dramatically, compared to slow drops of those of by telephone and email/letter.
In April, the number of personal requiries upsurged to nearly 900, at which point it continued to be the peak of the graph in June, at around 1090. Likewise, this month had seen a slight rebound in the quantity of by phone before it commenced to climbed substantially to over 1000 in June. By contrast, after having remained unchanged during April, the figure for by email/letter experienced an insignificant decrease to exactly one fifth of 1000 in June.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-26 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Đặng Ngọc Thanh Nhàn | 67 | view |
| 2023-04-09 | vuhungbo | 89 | view |
| 2023-04-09 | vuhungbo | 89 | view |
| 2023-04-09 | vuhungbo | 89 | view |
- The graph below shows the production of three forest industry products in a European country namely timber pulp and paper from 1980 to 2000 78
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry 78
- The diagrams below show the coastal village of Seaville in 1980 and 2010 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of the day working adults spent doing different activities in a particular country in 1958 and in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Nowadays more people move away from their friends and families for work Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y telephone and email/letter. In April, the number of personal requiries upsurge...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, so, whereas, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 981.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13612565445 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0495932824 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623036649215 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4552379638 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.625 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150171884421 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0676065241391 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10592534255 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115513689024 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133682815853 0.0819641961636 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y telephone and email/letter. In April, the number of personal requiries upsurge...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, so, whereas, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 981.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13612565445 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0495932824 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623036649215 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4552379638 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.625 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150171884421 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0676065241391 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10592534255 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115513689024 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133682815853 0.0819641961636 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.