The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.You should writ

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

You should write at least 150 words.

The given line chart illustrates the alterations and differences in the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011. There are three methods that customers used to transfer their inquiries: in person, by letter or email and by telephone.
In general, the research experienced a downward trend in customers choosing communication through phone, contrary to upward trend in customers using email, letter and face to face meeting.
The number of enquiries by letters and emails stood at 750 at the beginning, then slightly falling by 100 to 650 enquiries in Feb and maintained stable in Mar. After that, the research witnessed a constantly diminishing by 100 enquiries in Apr to 350, then plunge to 350 enquiries in May and maintained that number in Jun.
The number of enquiries received by phone experienced a decreasing from 850 to 800 enquiries in first 2 months of the years, contrary to a notable increasing by 200 to 1000 enquiries in Mar, following a levelling out in Apr. After that, a swift and significant growth was documented in customers communicating through phone by 400 to 1400 in May, before went to the peak at 1600 in Jun
In conclusion, while communication through phone and face to face experienced constant growth, enquiries by letter or email underwent diminishing over the first six months in 2011

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-27 Maleeha 67 view
2019-12-15 KIM JINUK 56 view
2019-11-15 SandraWolfie 84 view
2019-08-26 Nguyễn Hương Giang 78 view
2019-08-26 Minhthuminhthumingthu 67 view
Essays by user Spring2019 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, so, then, while, in conclusion, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 33.7804878049 207% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1387.0 965.302439024 144% => OK
No of words: 279.0 196.424390244 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97132616487 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86904521743 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483870967742 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 405.9 283.868780488 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.2638995609 43.030603864 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.111111111 112.824112599 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0 22.9334400587 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197304055856 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101993617976 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118037762425 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116837372573 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0926419596536 0.0819641961636 113% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.2329268293 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.14 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.