The chart illustrates the number of enquiries that the city Tourist Information Office received in the first two quarters of the year 2011.
Overall, telephone and face-to-face enquiry became more and more popular while letter or email enquiry trend noticeably decreased over the period. Another prominent feature is that the number of telephone enquiries were the highest over the first quarter, whereas in-person enquiry was in a dominant position during the second quarter.
In January, there were around 400 in-person enquiries and 900 telephone enquiries. Between January and March, while the number of enquiries via telephone slightly dropped before recovering to 1000, the figures for in-person query doubled from around 400 to 800. The level of email enquiries, however, remained relatively stable at about 700 in this period.
During the second quarter, enquiries via letter and email significantly fell, reaching its record low at just south of 400 in May and leveled off. By contrast, telephone enquiry significantly climbed to 1600 in June. The same tendency can be seen in the figures for in-person enquiry which experienced the most remarkable growth and peaked at 1900 enquiries as the period wound up.
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 89
- The chart below shows the numbers of male and female research students studying six science-related subjects at a UK university in 2009.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1036.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42408376963 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65274065375 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602094240838 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2685430026 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.111111111 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176334720391 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806633172538 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830517877861 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137909491267 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0992469412669 0.0819641961636 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 61.2550243902 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.