The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007
The line graph illustrates the quantities of foreigners travel to 3 types of natural destinations including the coast, the mountains and the lake in European nations in a period of 30 years starting in 1987.
In general, a growing number of people visited to those places over that period and the coast was the most popular choice in any other areas. Besides, the lake experienced the most noticeable change.In 1987, around 40 thousand of visitors paid for travelling to coastal place. During 1987 to 1992, there was an slightly decrease to nearly 35 thousand and then this figure tremendously increased and reached the peak at roughly 75 thousand visitors in 2007 which to became the most preferred tourist attraction . Lakes were also an attractive areas which saw a dramatically rose from 10% in 1987 to nearly 50% in 2000 and then there was an intersection between the lake and the coastal area which paved the way for the first ranking in 2002, at around 75 thousand travellers. In contrast, this figure then considerable dropped down for the last 5 years. Meanwhile, the mountains witnessed an erratic movement over period before ending with approximately 35 thousand of people in 2007.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-01-16 | honguyenlily | 67 | view |
2023-11-02 | tracywu | 73 | view |
2023-10-23 | Giang Tran | 61 | view |
2023-10-23 | Giang Tran | 61 | view |
2023-10-23 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 199, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
... experienced the most noticeable change.In 1987, around 40 thousand of visitors pa...
^^
Line 2, column 308, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...l place. During 1987 to 1992, there was an slightly decrease to nearly 35 thousand...
^^
Line 2, column 308, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decrease') instead of another adjective.
...l place. During 1987 to 1992, there was an slightly decrease to nearly 35 thousand and then this fig...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 398, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n this figure tremendously increased and reached the peak at roughly 75 thousand ...
^^
Line 2, column 510, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...me the most preferred tourist attraction . Lakes were also an attractive areas whi...
^^
Line 2, column 543, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'area'?
Suggestion: area
...raction . Lakes were also an attractive areas which saw a dramatically rose from 10% ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 559, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('dramatically') instead an adjective, or a noun ('rose') instead of another adjective.
...were also an attractive areas which saw a dramatically rose from 10% in 1987 to nearly 50% in 2000 ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 673, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...was an intersection between the lake and the coastal area which paved the way for...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, so, then, while, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 996.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00502512563 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74743516757 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608040201005 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.6762448895 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.285714286 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4285714286 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139402509267 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058160072327 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0333548321312 0.0843802449381 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1064224617 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00667649901847 0.0819641961636 8% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.