The graph below shows the number of people taking part in a wildlife survey in
Britain between 2001 and 2009. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting
the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The table provides data about the number of people who participated in a survey about wildlife in britain over a 9 years period, starting from 2001.
Looking at the data set for adults in more detail, it is clear that the number of adults who perticipated in the survey increased 36000 in 2001 to 332000 in 2005. After this period, the number of adult population fall down to 270000 in 2009. In 2005, the number of adult attendance was the peak in the table.
Turning to the data set for children, it is evident that the number of available children in wildlife survey was jumped from 12000 in 2001 to 36000 in 2003. Then the number of children participants was decreased slightly to 31000 in 2007 and after that it increased dramatically, 270000 in 2009, is the same number of participants as adults.
Overall, it can be seen that the total population in survay escalated every year over the period, from 48000 to 540000. So, It showed an upward trend.
- Claim Colleges and universities should specify all required courses and eliminate elective courses in order to provide clear guidance for students Reason College students like people in general prefer to follow directions rather than make their own decisi 66
- It is a good thing if senior management workers in a company get a much higher salary than other workers in the same company Do you agree or disagree 56
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed 66
- Any leader who is quickly and easily influenced by shifts in popular opinion will accomplish little 66
- The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 793.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66470588235 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51699414294 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523529411765 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 223.2 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8488876476 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.125 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163425330375 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0724691361346 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449059650812 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0995020044078 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504699362193 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.