the graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017. summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the yearly numbers of tourists vacationing on either cruise ships or island on a Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017. Overall, while the sum of visitors on the Caribbean island increased significantly throughout this period, there were downward trends in the numbers of visitors staying on cruise ships and island in the 2011-2012 and 2015-2016 periods respectively.
It is noticeable that after staying constant at around 0.75 million visitors in 2011, the figure for vacationers on island grew considerably by nearly 0.75 million people. Nevertheless, the number of guests staying on island in 2016 was approximately 0.25 million as small as that in 2015. By contrast, this number increased after 2016 and shared the same figure with that in 2015, which accounted for about 1.5 million tourists.
Regarding tourists staying on cruise ships, there was a slight rise of roughly 0.5 million people in that number between 2010 and 2011. Afterward, 0.5 million visitors staying on cruise ships dropped in a year later. The number of tourists who vacationed on cruise ships in 2017, just over 2 million people, was around 4 times as large as that in 2012, nearly 0.5 million people
- Nowadays many people work part or full time from home Some people say that working from home has many benefits while others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Some people feel that certain workers like nurses doctors and teachers are undervalued and should be paid more when other people like film actors or company bosses are paid huge sums of money that are out of proportion to the importance of the work that t 84
- The bar chart below shows the numbers of men and women attending various evening courses at an adult education centre in the year 2009 The pie chart gives information about the ages of these course participants 73
- The chart shows the information about salt intake in the US in 2000
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after 5 years 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, nevertheless, regarding, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1013.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1421319797 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67064902294 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517766497462 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4278273749 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.625 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.625 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157042797434 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0878341821719 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0893076514902 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121339062208 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0692253537516 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.