The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The graph displays the statistics of the total number of visitors who headed to the Caribbean island further classified based on the stay at the island or on the ship over a period of 7 years from 2010 to 2017.

Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that over the period as a whole, the number of visitors rose significantly. Although the island stay was popular in the earlier years, the trend reversed itself by the end of the period.

According to the given illustration, in 2010, nearly a fourth of a million stayed on ships, while about 700000 preferred an island stay that adds up to 1 million visitors that year. Moving on, whilst the tourists on ships climbed to half a million, the island stay remained consistent in 2011 that totals up to 1.3 million visitors in all. Further, between 2011 and 2012, the number on the island slacked off to 300000 visitors, whereas, the graph rose for the ship stay until it remained leveled off to 1.5 million for three consecutive years in a row with a total of 2.7 million visitors.

Thereafter, 2015 onwards, staying on the island witnessed a sharp plummet before managing the same previous level(1.5million). However, at this point, ships stay took over the island stay by 0.5 million more visitors leading to a total of 3.5 million tourists.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 260, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing to a total of 3.5 million tourists.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1093.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79385964912 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62388861698 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548245614035 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.8551488126 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.625 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115831395357 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583899996122 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481511885618 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0846934578055 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572660723093 0.0819641961636 70% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.