The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates how many tourists arrived to Caribbean island from 2010 to 2017.
Overall, it is clear that the figures for visitors staying both on cruise ships and on island had upward trends with some fluctuations.
In 2010, merely 1 million tourists visited Caribbean island, however three-fourth of them retained on island. The following year, nearly a half million tourists from the total of about 1.3 million tourists were on cruise ships. In 2013, there was a double increase in the number of visitors who stayed on the island, while tourists on cruise ship had fallen before recovering to 0.5 million. By 2017, the total number of visitors arrived to Caribbean island had increased significantly, reaching around 3.5 million. In 2017, the figure for visitors retaining on cruise ships rose considerably to 2 million, whereas the number of tourists staying on the island remained constantly for the rest of the period, except for falling and recovering in the last two years.
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 86
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The charts below show the number of visitors arriving in a particular country for a short trip and the number of residents leaving that country for a short trip from 2009 to 2011 100
- Universities are becoming increasingly expensive to operate In some countries money from taxation has met these costs However this is not always enough to maintain the quality of universities What are some ways universities could be funded in future 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, whereas, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 840.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15337423313 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64182920444 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58282208589 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3925276742 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2857142857 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198036644966 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117230035817 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0716101074864 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144760876964 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0859221071766 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.