The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The graph provides information about statistics of tourists and visitors who had trip to restriction of Caribbean island during the 7 years of 2010 to 2017.
Generally, couple lines depict the visitors who staying on island and who staying on cruise ships. Also, third line belongs to total result of assessments. In fact, the generic lines are upward movement which is evidence of increasing tourists in this region. Visitors that staying on island had the lowest portion between 0-0.5 million of tourists in 2010 then there were some fluctuation. In 2012 and 2010 had the same level and after 2012 the level has risen dramatically which in 2016 surpassed the visitors staying on cruise ships. In 2017 it reached to 2 million of visitors. While, the second line of cruise ships visitors started between 0.5-1 then it had marginal increase and roughly remained steadily. Actually, the total line demonstrates increased trend from 1 million visitors in 2010 and a stability for a year between 2015-2016 and finally dramatic rise till 3 million.

Votes
Average: 7.4 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, finally, second, so, then, third, while, in fact

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 875.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08720930233 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61068523441 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587209302326 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.1432306959 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2222222222 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136386560313 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637387833069 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066153708168 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155951354535 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0676584429021 0.0819641961636 83% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.