The line graph illustrates how many travellers visited a Caribbean island from 2010 to 2017. Units are measured in millions.
Overall, it is evident that the trend was generally upward with the total number of visitors being showing the highest rate. Additionally, although, in the beginning period, the figure for tourists saying on island was more than that of those who stayed on cruise ships, in the final year, the latter overtook the former.
In 2010, the number of total visitors stood at exactly 1 million, which was then followed by a gradual increase reaching the peak of 3.5million in 2017. Similarly, in the first given year, the rate for the travellers staying on cruise ships started at approximately 0.3 million before witnessing a steady growth to 0.5 million in the following year. However, in 2012, it declined to the same level which it had been at in 2010 but it recovered immediately and saw a constant rise reaching at 2 million at the end of the given period.
Regarding the visitors who stayed on island, the number was around 0.7 million in 2010 before levelling off for the next year. Between 2011 and 2013, the trend markedly increased after which it remained constant for the next 2 years. In 2016, it experienced a slight fall to roughly 1.3 million, and it was then followed by an increase to 1.5 million in 2017.
- Society is based on rules and laws It could not function if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 73
- In some countries only few young people go to classical music concerts or to play and perform at the theater Why is this the case Should young people be encouraged to attend and learn more 78
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010 78
- The table below shows the changes in some household types in Great Britain from 1971 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, regarding, similarly, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1118.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7982832618 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55166006218 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562231759657 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7923149687 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.8 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12940482926 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591815550168 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643634927951 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0996450799782 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598217297386 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.