The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017
The line graph compares amount of travelers to Caribbean island over a perid of 7 years.
Overall, from 2010 to 2017, the total number of tourists visits rose dramatically to a peak. However, the smallest number of people stayed on island.
It is clear that, in 2010 visitors staying on cruis ships significantly increased from about 0,2 in 2010 to around 2 million in 2017. Furthermore, over the 5 years period the visitors staying on island rose considerably from approximately 0,7 in 2010 to 1,5 in 2015 but in 2016 negligible amount decreased about 1,2 million of visitors, in 2017 overtook, with 1,5 tourists visits to Caribbean island.
According to the line graph, the total number of tourists visits increased from just over 0,9 in 2010 to just under 2,1 in 2013. In 2014 the percentage of visitors close to 2,5 million. Moreover, from 2015 to 2016 it was not increased or decreased but in 2017 rose significantly to peak of the graph around 3,5 million number of tourists visits a Carabbean island. From the graph we can see in the total has more visits to island than other type of visits.
- The bar chart on the next page shows the results of a survey of the reading habits of male and female first year university students at a university in the UK The pie chart show the amount of time male and female students spend on various activities 63
- The table below summarises some data collected by a college bookshop for the month of February 2000 100
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured 84
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 84
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, moreover
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 917.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77604166667 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66267095663 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494791666667 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.022825573 43.030603864 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.888888889 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374107141118 0.215688989381 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171190407539 0.103423049105 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0811752958224 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249065797804 0.15604864568 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584747884595 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.06 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.