The graph below shows the percentage of the Australian workforce in five industries between 1962 and 2012. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given picture depicts the figure for the Australian in five industries in the period of 50 years from 19662 to 2012.
Overall, services were the dominant major in Australia with the highest figure of five industries, as opposed to mining which was least developed with the least percentage of workforce. It was also noticeable that the data of construction witnessed no modification.
Regarding the figure for Australian workforce in Services, it began at roughly 51%, then which rose to 65% in the next two decade. This figure, which experienced a significant increase to approximately 77% in 2002 and finally reached a peak of around 79% in 2012. In terms of mining, it commenced at about 0.5% in 1962, which witnessed a minimal rise to about 1% in 1972 and the data of the next two decades was equivalent to the record in 1972. Subsequently, the proportion of mining workforce in 2002 declined to about 0,l% and finally increased slightly to 2%, which was lower than the figure of services by about 77%.
To talk about the figure for Australian workforce in manufacturing, it started at about 37% in the first years, after which observed a slight decline to about 27% in 1972. From 1982 onward, the figure decreased considerably to approximately 11% and finished at 10% in the last year, which was higher than the figure of mining by approximately 8%. Regarding the proportion of agriculture, it made up 10% in 1962, which is identical to the record of manufacturing in the last year. There is a downward trend in the percentage of the agricultural workforce, dramatically decreasing from 9% in 1972 to around 5% in 2002 and finally reaching about 3% in the last year. The proportion of laborers working in construction major stayed unchanged throughout 50 years.
- The table illustrates the proportion of monthly household income that five European countries spend on food and drink housing clothing and entertainment 67
- Some people think that countries should produce food their population eats and import less food as much as possible To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The graph below shows the percentage of the Australian workforce in five industries between 1962 and 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some groups of people have benefited from modern communication technology However some think they do not have any benefit from this To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people have benefited from modern communications technology but some people have not benefited from it at all To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, regarding, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 33.7804878049 225% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 965.302439024 153% => OK
No of words: 300.0 196.424390244 153% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92666666667 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97242138481 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 106.607317073 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 437.4 283.868780488 154% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2144225504 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.166666667 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0811012782156 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0348939723507 0.103423049105 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0347053631159 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0670261140686 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390829401627 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.