The graph below shows the percentage of mobile phone owners using various mobile phone features in Vietnam in the year 2005, 2008, 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The table compares how many people who had a mobile phone and used for one of 4 different functions in it in Vietnam in 3 years: 2005, 2008, 2010.
Overall, from 2005 to 2010, the rate of mobile phones used for making calls in Vietnam always stand at the biggest percentage and declined minimally in the last 2 years, while the number of people in Vietnam used there phones to take photos experienced a enormous rise during 5 years shown. In contrast, the percentage of mobile phones users spent time on texting or recording audio in Vietnam fall significantly in all 3 years.
It’s absolutely proved from the table that in 2005 and 2008, Vietnamese people always used their phones to call someone, then this rate decreased minimally in 2 years next, ended at 97% in 2010, whereas the rate of mobile phone owners used for taking pictures in Vietnam stand at the lowest percentage, with 65% in 2005, but this rate saw a dramatic increasion in the next 5 years, reached a peak of 77% in 2010, which is reported that Vietnamese people used their phones for taking photos more than texting and recording.
Turning to the next two features of a mobile phone: Texting message, and record audio. In 2005 and 2010, the number of people in Vietnam used mobile phones for texting message more than that used their phones for record, about 4% and 5% higher, respectively per year. However, the percentage of Vietnamese people who have a phone used for texting is 5% higher than that used for audio recording in 2008.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-21 | minhtran224 | 67 | view |
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment What can governments do to address these problems What can individual people do 78
- University education should be free to everyone regardless of income To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The Barchart below demonstrates the various types of accommodation chosen by the British when they went on holiday in 2010 84
- The charts detail the proportion of Australian secondary school graduates who were unemployed employed or further education in 1980 1990 and 2000 78
- The chart shows the proportion of working age adults in four countries from 1960 to 2050 Units are given in percentages 69
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 254, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...there phones to take photos experienced a enormous rise during 5 years shown. In ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, then, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1253.0 965.302439024 130% => OK
No of words: 266.0 196.424390244 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71052631579 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39192597159 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477443609023 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 371.7 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 22.4926829268 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 139.493983485 43.030603864 324% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 179.0 112.824112599 159% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.0 22.9334400587 166% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343393956005 0.215688989381 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.202019194992 0.103423049105 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463616105123 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245405857048 0.15604864568 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0292043662559 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.8 13.2329268293 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.83 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.3012195122 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.63 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.9970731707 156% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 254, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...there phones to take photos experienced a enormous rise during 5 years shown. In ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, then, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1253.0 965.302439024 130% => OK
No of words: 266.0 196.424390244 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71052631579 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39192597159 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477443609023 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 371.7 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 22.4926829268 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 139.493983485 43.030603864 324% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 179.0 112.824112599 159% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.0 22.9334400587 166% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343393956005 0.215688989381 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.202019194992 0.103423049105 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463616105123 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245405857048 0.15604864568 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0292043662559 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.8 13.2329268293 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.83 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.3012195122 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.63 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.9970731707 156% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.