The graph below shows the percentage in places where students lived over five decades.
A comparison of the percentage of the students' lived preferences between 1960 and 2000 is presented in the bar graph.
In the initial year, both proportion of students stayed in shared room with other pupils, and for those lived together with a host family witnessed the same amount at 35%. This is also accounted for such students either who lived in the students hall or at home with 15% was by far the fewest. By 2000, however, there had been some increased, and it had widened out from 35% to 70%, a rise of 25%.
Moreover, the other figures saw a noticeable decrease while those students lived with such host family hit a trough at very small proportion (5%). In the 1970 to 1990, students who lived with other students saw a rise whereas the figure for those stayed with a host family showed the reverse and with by far the fewest. This contrasted to other figures showing fluctuation onwards.
Overall, the most noticeable changes were seen in the figure for those lived in a shared house and such students stayed with a host family while the other figures saw a fluctuation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-26 | Fayna Faradiena | 67 | view |
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists travelling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia s share of the Japanese tourist market
- Some parents think that childcare centres provide the best services for children of preschool age. Other working parents think that family members such as grandparents will be better careers for their kids. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- The graph below shows the percentage in places where students lived over five decades. 67
- Some people believe that the higher a product is priced, the most likely it is that people will want to buy it. To what extent does price influence potential buyers? What other factors influence people to buy a product? 78
- The diagrams below show the development of a small fishing village and its surrounding area into a large European tourist resort. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 239, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...r such students either who lived in the students hall or at home with 15% was by far the...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, moreover, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 900.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6875 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41035004229 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494791666667 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5186643071 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.5 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162927326956 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0910213769343 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614735000963 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127626736357 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0597901628908 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.