The line graph illustrates the proportion of cities’ citizens in 4 countries from 1970 until now and the expectation for 2030.
In general, it is evident that people in the USA had a tendency to live in cities while the opposite was true for India. In addition, the percentage of population in cities in China increased rapidly between 1990 and 2010.
As can be seen from the graph, with regards to the figure for cities’ population in the USA, it began at 70%, was higher than three other countries. This figure rose gradually and is predicted to hit the highest point in 2030, at 90%. Similarly, the period from 1970 to 2000 saw a considerable climb in the percentage of residents living in Korea’s cities between 40% and 80%, before experiencing a minimal rise to under 90%. It is expected that the rate will reach 90% in 2030.
Looking at the graph in more detail, the figure for individuals in China and India in 1970 was similar, hovering at 20%. The proportion of cities’ citizens in China remained stable until 1980 while in India, the figure remained flat to 1990. Regarding India, there was a growth to approximately 33% in 2000, before predicting to rise to under 40% in 2030. Meanwhile, there was a marked climb to 60% in 2010 in the proportion of cities’ people in China, which is forecasted to increase steadily to 66% in 2030.
- The graph shows Japanese average monthly salary Yen from 1953 to 1983 and the prices of black and white television and color television during the same period 75
- the two maps compare the changes of a community center 63
- The diagram shows how energy is produced from coal 85
- Advertisements bring many negative effects on people and the society. What are these effects? How to solve this problem? 89
- Government should change the way individuals live while others believe they should choose the way themselves. Discuss these both points of view and give your opinion. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, regarding, similarly, while, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 33.7804878049 172% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1140.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78991596639 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79314129653 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521008403361 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 336.6 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2616752358 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.636363636 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6363636364 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126962862915 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0562016765692 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0316409521881 0.0843802449381 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0901670818514 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0181837711667 0.0819641961636 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.