The line graph compares percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UK in over a period of 8 years.
overall, it was clear that was 4 different types of domestic access. There were included CD player, mobile phone, home computer and internet access which was rose steadily from 1996 to 2003.
In a couple of years 1996 and 1997, the majority of domestic access was CD player, were of 80% while the percentage of home computer and mobile phone were lower than CD player, the former was approximately 29% and the latter was about 19%. In the same period, Internet access was not popular, and people began use internet access in the following years which was 10% in 1998 and 1999
From 1998 to 2002, all of domestic access was rose dramatically. While CD player rose approximately 21% and still highest with 81% in 2003, the percentage of mobile phone overtook home computer tripled with approximately 40% of increasing and was 70% in the same time. The percentage home computer and internet access rose gradually with 25% and 30%. The fromer was 55% and the latter was 40% in 2003
- The graph below shows the numbers of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 67
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030 73
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030 67
- The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UK 67
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Overall
...in the UK in over a period of 8 years. overall, it was clear that was 4 different type...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73232323232 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49059551386 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484848484848 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.0242493431 43.030603864 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.125 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249399687362 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148801717558 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.183649209258 0.0843802449381 218% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237777286687 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.222250775006 0.0819641961636 271% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.