The line graph compares percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UK in over a period of 8 years.
overall, it was clear that was 4 different types of domestic access. There were included CD player, mobile phone, home computer and internet access which was rose steadily from 1996 to 2003.
In a couple of years 1996 and 1997, the majority of domestic access was CD player, were of 80% while the percentage of home computer and mobile phone were lower than CD player, the former was approximately 29% and the latter was about 19%. In the same period, Internet access was not popular, and people began use internet access in the following years which was 10% in 1998 and 1999
From 1998 to 2002, all of domestic access was rose dramatically. While CD player rose approximately 21% and still highest with 81% in 2003, the percentage of mobile phone overtook home computer tripled with approximately 40% of increasing and was 70% in the same time. The percentage home computer and internet access rose gradually with 25% and 30%. The fromer was 55% and the latter was 40% in 2003
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030 67
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030 73
- The graph below shows the numbers of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 67
- The line below shows the land used for organic crops in two countries between 1985 to 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 67
- The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UK 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Overall
...in the UK in over a period of 8 years. overall, it was clear that was 4 different type...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73232323232 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49059551386 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484848484848 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.0242493431 43.030603864 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.125 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249399687362 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148801717558 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.183649209258 0.0843802449381 218% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237777286687 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.222250775006 0.0819641961636 271% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.