the graph below shows the percentage of urban and rural househols in a european country that had internet access between 1999 and 2004
The supplied bar chart indicates the number of urban and rural houses that got internet access in European country in 1999 to 2004.
At the first glance, it is clearly seen that the details of internet access at urban household maintained upward trend till 2002 it increased slightly to 2004. In addition, the rate of rural househol internet access climbed up gradually from 1999 to 2004.
As it is presented in the chart, urban houses that got access to internet grew up dramatically from approximately 15% to 50% in 1999-2002. In the other hand, the period in 2 years later moved up with slower rate to 55%. By comparison, there was threefold increace bewteen the highest detail with the lowest one. As regards the rural households, the proportion enhanced progessively from about 3% to 45%. By contrast, it is clearly seen that the pecentage improved a large amount of 42%.
Overall, it can be told that there is a obvious upward trend in internet access in Europian housholds during 1999 to 2004.
The supplied bar chart indicates the number of urban and rural houses that got internet access in European country in 1999 to 2004.
At the first glance, it is clearly seenThe supplied bar chart indicates the number of urban and rural houses that got internet access in European country in 1999 to 2004.
At the first glance, it is clearly seen that the details of internet access at urban household maintained upward trend till 2002 it increased slightly to 2004. In addition, the rate of rural househol internet access climbed up gradually from 1999 to 2004.
As it is presented in the chart, urban houses that got access to internet grew up dramatically from approximately 15% to 50% in 1999-2002. In the other hand, the period in 2 years later moved up with slower rate to 55%. By comparison, there was threefold increace bewteen the highest detail with the lowest one. As regards the rural households, the proportion enhanced progessively from about 3% to 45%. By contrast, it is clearly seen that the pecentage improved a large amount of 42%.
Overall, it can be told that there is a obvious upward trend in internet access in Europian housholds during 1999 to 2004.
that the details of internet access at urban household maintained upward trend till 2002 it increased slightly to 2004. In addition, the rate of rural househol internet access climbed up gradually from 1999 to 2004.
As it is presented in the chart, urban houses that got access to internet grew up dramatically from approximately 15% to 50% in 1999-2002. In the other hand, the period in 2 years later moved up with slower rate to 55%. By comparison, there was threefold increace bewteen the highest detail with the lowest one. As regards the rural households, the proportion enhanced progessively from about 3% to 45%. By contrast, it is clearly seen that the pecentage improved a large amount of 42%.
Overall, it can be told that there is a obvious upward trend in internet access in Europian housholds during 1999 to 2004.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-05 | Emma1998 | 90 | view |
| 2019-07-31 | ok.me | 74 | view |
| 2019-06-15 | Mishika sugandhi | 78 | view |
| 2018-07-19 | its_baohan | 67 | view |
| 2017-01-22 | mehraein.jafarzadeh@yahoo.com | 79 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 39, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... Overall, it can be told that there is a obvious upward trend in internet access...
^
Line 11, column 2, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: That
...pian housholds during 1999 to 2004. that the details of internet access at urban...
^^^^
Line 15, column 39, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... Overall, it can be told that there is a obvious upward trend in internet access...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, so, as regards, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 20.0 5.60731707317 357% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 33.7804878049 213% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1684.0 965.302439024 174% => OK
No of words: 343.0 196.424390244 175% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90962099125 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 3.73543355544 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61383879944 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.285714285714 0.547539520022 52% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 477.0 283.868780488 168% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 1.53170731707 457% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 8.94146341463 201% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.5282682993 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5555555556 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0555555556 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.88888888889 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 8.0 3.83414634146 209% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31925750031 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125439328814 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119568707654 0.0843802449381 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219184107184 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0975481270008 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.6 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.