The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph illustrates that how population changed since 2000 and how they will modify in the future. Generally, It is clear that India population will overcome China over the period shown.

In 2000, The proportion of the Chinese population was higher than India, with the rate of about 1,25 billion, while India was around just 1 billion. Between 2000 and present, figures for India population slightly increased about 0,2 billion. Over the same period, There has been a 0,1 billion rise in the number of a Chinese citizen.

According to the graph, India will increase more quickly rather than rates of China and, experts say that by 2030, both countries will have the same proportion of 1,45 billion. After this China population more likely to fall a little to 1,4 billion in 2050, while the Indian population will rose and reach 1.6.

Thus over the 50-year period. Indian will experience unprecedented its population growth and will overtake China. On the other hand, China will peak in 2030 and also begin to fall by degree.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-14 Kien Vu 78 view
2019-11-13 cindycornelia98 78 view
2019-10-29 ngothithunguyet 67 view
2019-10-07 Nehaa Sharma 67 view
2019-09-04 lordwind 84 view
Essays by user Enkhamgalan :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 292, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'rise'
Suggestion: rise
... 2050, while the Indian population will rose and reach 1.6. Thus over the 50-year...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... population will rose and reach 1.6. Thus over the 50-year period. Indian will ex...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, thus, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 869.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96571428571 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36125182987 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611428571429 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.4105533474 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5555555556 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4444444444 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223819350933 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106622321172 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618280446635 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1436695546 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0273575729992 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.