The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph gives information about the number of citizens who accommodate in 2 different countries India and China over 50 years from 2000 to 2050.
What stands out from the graph is that there were 2 similar trends for these 2 figures, which progress gradually. It’s noticeable that the population in India is predicted growth up in the future.
Looking at the chart for more details, it can be seen that the inhabitant lives in china was more than 1.2 billions of people, which gained a higher point than the India’s population in 2000, about 0.2 billion people. Between 2000 and 2020, the citizens of both city improved considerably and the figures are projected to go up at the same point in 2030, at nearly 1.5 billions people. The population in India with an expected value of this trend will improve moderately about 1.6 billions people by the end of the century. On the other hand, after rising noticeably from 2000 to 2030, it will be predicted population a decline slightly until 2050.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-04 | Lily Ha | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-19 | bemoichoianhyeuem | 10 | view |
| 2023-08-19 | bemoichoianhyeuem | view | |
| 2023-08-18 | bemoichoianhyeuem | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-07 | qaptpa | view |
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 67
- The diagram below shows the process of making soft cheese Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The table below shows percentage of students giving good ratings for different aspects of a university in China in 2000 2005 2010 67
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the honey bee 82
- The graph below shows the amount of electricity produced from different energy sources to supply the city of New York between 1980 and 2000 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...China over 50 years from 2000 to 2050. What stands out from the graph is that t...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is predicted growth up in the future. Looking at the chart for more details, i...
^^^
Line 5, column 106, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '2 billion'.
Suggestion: 2 billion
...habitant lives in china was more than 1.2 billions of people, which gained a higher point tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 840.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8275862069 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51188218683 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626436781609 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9800970892 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268422347975 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132253893004 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0768724484591 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183414753637 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0097435551171 0.0819641961636 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.