The picture highlights data about how many people will learn to use the three most common languages in the world over a 10-year period, from 2020 to 2030.
Overall, it is clear that the number of students of these languages is predicted to increase throughout the period. Interestingly, projections show that there will be more people will learn English than others who will choose Spanish or Mandarin.
Regarding English, it is estimated that the number of people who will learn this language will rise significantly in the first 4 years, from 550 million to 700 million. After that, the figure is forecasted to decrease slightly to 620 million, and then go up to 730 million in 2030. The differences between the number of students of English and that of Spanish and Mandarin will be remarkable in 2030, 180 million and 230 million, respectively.
When it comes to 2 other languages, it is projected that 100 million people will learn Mandarin, with opposed to 200 million people who will learn Spanish, in 2020. After that, the figures for these languages will increase considerably. There will be no difference between the number of people will learn these languages in 2026, the figures are both estimated to be 350 million. At the end of the period, there will be more students of Mandarin than that of Spanish, 580 million with opposed to 500 million.
- the graph below shows predictions about the numbers of people who will study three major world languages between 2020 and 2030 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
- The charts below show UK and USA energy consumption in 2000 and 2006.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 1.00243902439 1297% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 3.15609756098 380% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 16.0 5.60731707317 285% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1132.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90043290043 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62261214984 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489177489177 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.4824507373 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.2 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201581148463 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101287135256 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544088839516 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153229456073 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324991103889 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.