The graph below shows the price of bananas in 4 different countries from 1996 to 2004
The line graph illustrates the price of bananas in four different nations named Japan, France, Germany, and the USA from 1994 to 2004.
In general, it is clear that the price of bananas in Japan and the USA saw ascending trends while the opposite was the case for the others.
At the start of the period, the prices of bananas in Japan were in the first rank at approximately 2 USD/kg. The data for France and Germany was 1.75 USD/kg and just nearly 1.50 USD/kg, respectively. The figure for the USA was the lowest at 0.75 USD/kg.
Afterward, the cost of bananas increased significantly from just nearly 200 USD/kg to 3.80 USD/kg in 1995, before heating a bottom at just over 1.5 USD/kg in 2001, and it grew dramatically to reach 2.5 USD/kg in 2004. Similarly, there was a steady rise in the cost of bananas in the USA between 0.75 USD in 1994 and just above 1 USD/kg in the year 2004. In contrast, the cost in France and Germany witnessed a decrease at 1.5 USD and 1.25 USD/kg in the final year 2004, respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-28 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2022-06-28 | Trần Ánh Vy | 74 | view |
| 2022-06-28 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2022-03-07 | ReignNVT | 67 | view |
| 2021-11-21 | ghazaleh Basiri | 61 | view |
- The chart below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph below shows the price of bananas in 4 different countries from 1996 to 2004 67
- The chart below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 73
- The maps show the library five years ago and now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, similarly, while, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 835.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.48924731183 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45602437467 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494623655914 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0906381786 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.375 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143086693834 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0859567222185 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.093940204606 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132055768548 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108491831176 0.0819641961636 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.06 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.