The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials from 1982 to 2000 in a particular country
The line graph illustrates the information about the paper and cardboard glass containers aluminium cans and Plastic materials that were reuse from 1982 to 2010 in a particular nation. Data is calibrated percentage.
At the first glance Highest ratio of recycling rate for paper and cardBoard materials in 1982 to 2010 and a glass container the percentage over half proportion gradually decrease in 1986 And it lie between 40 percentage Card from this paper and cardboard raised in 1990 the ratio was 15 of paper and cardboard and 5% in Glass container. Surprisingly for paper and cardboard downfall in the ratio of 70 and Glass container was rise the proportion of 60.
However in 1982 The two proportion of aluminium cans Dramatically increased in 2010 and The ratio was 45. Last but not the least in 1986 nearly 1% slightly increased plastic up to 2010. The percentage of plastic was approximately 10.
Overall, Paper and cardboard work most recycled materials although the Trend was downward For these materials Why others experience and upward trend. Even though there was Some fluctuations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-27 | MAD__FOODIEEE | 100 | view |
- Nowadays, more children are choosing co-education study. Is this a positive or negative development for student. 90
- When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
- Nowadays there is a trend that reports of media focus on pronouns and emergencies rather than postive of development. Some people think it is harmful to individuals and to society to what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials from 1982 to 2000 in a particular country 100
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their level of health and fitness is decreasing.What do you think are the cause of the problems and what measures could be taken to solve them? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 80, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'containers'' or 'container's'?
Suggestion: containers'; container's
...ion about the paper and cardboard glass containers aluminium cans and Plastic materials so...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 14, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'glance the Highest'.
Suggestion: glance the Highest
... calibrated percentage. At the first glance Highest ratio of recycling rate for paper and c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...roportion gradually decrease in 1986 And it lie between 40 percentage Card from t...
^^
Line 3, column 196, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lies'?
Suggestion: lies
...tion gradually decrease in 1986 And it lie between 40 percentage Card from this pa...
^^^
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and 5% in Glass container. Surprisingly for paper and cardboard downfall in the ...
^^
Line 3, column 415, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'container' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'containers'.
Suggestion: containers
...d downfall in the ratio of 70 and Glass container was rise the proportion of 60. However...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ntainer was rise the proportion of 60. However in 1982 The two proportion of aluminium...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 165, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ast in 1986 nearly 1% slightly increased plastic up to 2010. The percentage of pl...
^^
Line 6, column 151, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[2]
Message: “Even though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...Why others experience and upward trend. Even though there was Some fluctuations.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 959.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18378378378 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89350296119 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556756756757 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 94.375137969 43.030603864 219% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 106.555555556 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.55555555556 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135831738496 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0500244788058 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544190592317 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0868826783685 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415641004007 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.