The line garph provides information about the percentage of four varied substances namely paper and cardboard, glass containers, aluminum cans and plastics according to their recycling rates between the period 1982 and 2010.
Overall, the highest re-utilized product was paper and cardboard whereas, Plastic was least recycled material. In contrast, recycling of aluminum cans showed constant rise. In comparison with, the year 1990-1994 all the components rose in recycling.
Paper and cardboard was the largest recycled material around 65% initially in year 1982 and second to it was glass containers at the half of total proportion of recycling. Both showed decline in recycling between the period of 1986 to 1990. Whilst, glass containers increased compared to paper and cardboard which fell but maintained the upward trend at the end about 70% and 60% respectively.
Aluminum cans rose steadily from 1984 around 2% and reached about 45% in 2008. Plastic was least recycled, beginning in the year 1998 about 1% showed constant growth below one in ten of total recycling.
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 68
- the diagram below shows a simple system that turns dirty water into clean water. 78
- The chart below shows the aid from six developed countries to developing countries from 2008 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 77
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the seaside resort of Templeton between 1990 and 2005.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The bar chart shows the percentage of dependents in five different countries around the world in 2000 and 2050 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 100, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... four varied substances namely paper and cardboard, glass containers, aluminum ca...
^^
Line 3, column 177, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
... aluminum cans showed constant rise. In comparison with, the year 1990-1994 all the compon...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, second, so, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 915.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41420118343 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68691181763 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573964497041 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.2978176255 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.666666667 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166965751999 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.069174559082 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487480747676 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0994941290028 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0212458236353 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.