It is often argued, that e-learning is considered more important and has many advantages that it can take place of school teachers in students life. Other people claim that face to face learning is vital aspect which can not be taken over by any. This essay will examine both views in detail and according to my opinion traditional way of learning have remained at its best till now and will stay that way upto coming era's.
On the one hand, education provided by internet is effecient way of learning. In detail, e-learning saves time of students as they don't have to leave their homes for study because it generates financial problems such as living expenses though they have to work for long hours to bear expenses and this often results in lacking time for study. Moreover, huge amount of cost is also saved with online education on country level, government don't have to spend money on infrastucture and facilities. That's why, money can be utilized in other major issues like providing aid to needy and poor.
On the other hand, Relations between teacher and student is more interative when lectures are delivered in classrooms because teacher teaches children discipline to make them better person and citizens for country as he/she develops moral values and ethics for instance, every student is not active and disciplined, some are notorious who need an eye to be looking at them to get good results and else they won't do hardwork to accomplish their goals. Secondly, students learn coperation and cordination in schools among other peers which is not possible in case of e-learning.
In conclusion, I firmly believe traditional education can not be neglected or replaced by any other method of learning because it can assist students with various skills which is not availble in case of online education.
- The graph below shows the information on waste disposal in a European country from 2005 to 2008. 73
- Many countries spend a lot of money in art Some people think investment in art is necessary but others say money is better spent on public services and facilities Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- nowadays men s sports are given far more attention by the society compared to women s sports What are the reasons for that Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 56
- Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters 74
- The table below shows how young people in Tokyo, Japan, listened to music over the previous month. The pie chart shows a record company’s international findings about whether people preferred live or recorded music.Summarize the information by selecting 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 349, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to have'
Suggestion: to have
... my opinion traditional way of learning have remained at its best till now and will ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 132, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...learning saves time of students as they dont have to leave their homes for study bec...
^^^^
Line 3, column 439, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... education on country level, government dont have to spend money on infrastucture an...
^^^^
Line 3, column 497, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
... money on infrastucture and facilities. Thats why, money can be utilized in other maj...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1522.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99016393443 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55677588563 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609836065574 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 105.66309668 49.4020404114 214% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 152.2 106.682146367 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5 20.7667163134 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213708189197 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084229607401 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586502343252 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131646592837 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0783070582582 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.