The bar chart provides information about proportion of adults by age group using the internet in the uk, between 2003 and 2006.
Overall, intially old age people usage of internet was least compared to youngsters and each year experienced fluctuation throughout the age groups and showed upward trend in the end.
In 2003 and 2004, both age groups from 16 to 24 showed stability at four-fifths. Then, they fell in next age group(25-44) about 30% and 20% respectively. However, further in 45-54 age group internet users inclined gradually by 60% in 2003 and 70% in 2004. Again, depicted steady drop in 55-64 group of age around 25% & 23% approximately and hitting a low point by eradicating internet users in 2003 and around 17% in 2004.
From 2005 to 2006, youngsters were highest amongest others internet consumers to 100% and 90% respectively. In 25-44 aged people illustrated rapid decline around 25% and small decrease of 5%. In next age group(45-54) it depicted slight rose about 2% and leveled of in 2005. Again, it went down to half in 2004 and around 45% in 2005, by the end of period(65+) it showed downward trend in years as least of internet users were about 17% and 20% in 2005 and 2006 respectively.
- The table below shows how young people in Tokyo, Japan, listened to music over the previous month. The pie chart shows a record company’s international findings about whether people preferred live or recorded music.Summarize the information by selecting 84
- Many people use social media to keep in touch with other people and for news events Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages 50
- The bar graph shows the global sales (in billions of dollars) of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006. 73
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 78
- The map shows the development of Meadowside village and Fonton over three different time periods (1962,1985 and present) Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1006.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81339712919 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66821383689 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55980861244 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.603138903 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.6 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.7 5.23603664747 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319353448539 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136047122329 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107132524751 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227556767951 0.15604864568 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11306515874 0.0819641961636 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.