The given line graph depicts about proportion of four vary produts recycled during 1982 to 2010.
The data has been celibirated in ratio and years.
Overall, the maximum amount of paper and cardboard recycled, while plastic on the bottom of the chart.
Having a quick glance toward the graph it reveal that in1982, 65 percent plastic and cardboard products were reproduced,closely followed by the ratio of glass contaiers(50).
The line for platic products showed a slight trend , on the contrary the propotion of glass containers went down in 1986.Probing ahead, in 1990, the ration of paper and cardboard hit the peak(80), after it started to declined continuously till 70 percent in 2010. Interestingly, the amount of glass recycled reached on 60 with having slower increasement.
Looking at the remaining data, the proportion of aluminium cans materials climbed from 1 to 45 percent from beginning to untill the end. Adding more, the recyclealion of plastic product no more tha 10 percent in whole the period.
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. 78
- The pie chart below shows where energy is used in a typical Australian household, and the table shows the amount of eletricity used according to the number of occupants.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compa 80
- Differences between countries become less evident each year Nowadays all over the world people share the same fashions advertising brands eating habits and TV channels what are the advantage and disadvantages of this 73
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end world poverty and hunger. Others say that economic growth is damaging the environment and should stop. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 56
- The pie chart below shows where energy is used in a typical Australian household, and the table shows the amount of eletricity used according to the number of occupants.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compa 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... been celibirated in ratio and years. Overall, the maximum amount of paper and...
^^^
Line 6, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... bottom of the chart. Having a quick glance toward the graph it reveal that i...
^^
Line 6, column 44, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'reveals'?
Suggestion: reveals
...ing a quick glance toward the graph it reveal that in1982, 65 percent plastic and car...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 121, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , closely
...c and cardboard products were reproduced,closely followed by the ratio of glass contaie...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 129, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rdboard products were reproduced,closely followed by the ratio of glass contaiers...
^^
Line 7, column 51, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...or platic products showed a slight trend , on the contrary the propotion of glass ...
^^
Line 7, column 122, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Probing
...n of glass containers went down in 1986.Probing ahead, in 1990, the ration of paper and...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 195, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n of paper and cardboard hit the peak80, after it started to declined continuousl...
^^
Line 7, column 254, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to declined continuously till 70 percent in 2010. Interestingly, the amount of g...
^^
Line 7, column 279, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...till 70 percent in 2010. Interestingly, the amount of glass recycled reached on...
^^
Line 7, column 309, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...restingly, the amount of glass recycled reached on 60 with having slower increas...
^^
Line 9, column 118, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mbed from 1 to 45 percent from beginning to untill the end. Adding more, the rec...
^^
Line 9, column 151, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ginning to untill the end. Adding more, the recyclealion of plastic product no m...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 856.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21951219512 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90416249194 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646341463415 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.9958415944 43.030603864 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 13.0 1.69756097561 766% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197785013329 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748859931844 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0930604243277 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0874792415518 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0973279177543 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.