The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparsions where revelant.
The graph depicts the percentage of different kinds of materials that were recycled from the year 1989 to 2010 in a particular
country. The recycling rate is denoted in percentage.
On analyzing the graph,the plastics were least recycled and it has only started from the year 1989 to 2009.It was only a gradual increase but never had spikes or lows.The next material recycled is the aluminium cans which was started in the year 1984 and inclined towards the year 2010.
The next material which generally had began recycling from the year 1982 is the glass containers.It declined in the year 1988 and had gradual increase towards the year 2010.The last material which was recycled at a greater percentage since year 1982 is the paper and cardboard.It had spikes and lows throughout the year from 1989 to 2010.It was the only material which maintained the recycling rate in the country.
The overall recycling rate has gradually increased throughout the year even though there was highs and lows. This shows that people are aware of the need for recycling the products and its benefits to the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-12 | Bao Linh Le | 56 | view |
| 2018-08-21 | yamini venkatesan | 67 | view |
- The diagram shows how electricity is generated by a hydroelectric dam.Write a 150-word report for a university lecturer explaining how the process works. 67
- In many developed countries life expectancy is rising while birthrates are falling As a result the elderly will make up a much larger proportion of the population in future Is this a positive or negative development 81
- The graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of a major university in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparsions where revelant. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...om the year 1989 to 2010 in a particular country. The recycling rate is denoted i...
^^^
Line 3, column 23, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...d in percentage. On analyzing the graph,the plastics were least recycled and it has...
^^^^
Line 3, column 107, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...only started from the year 1989 to 2009.It was only a gradual increase but never h...
^^
Line 3, column 142, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually put between 'had' and 'spikes'.
Suggestion: had never spikes
...2009.It was only a gradual increase but never had spikes or lows.The next material recycled is t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...l increase but never had spikes or lows.The next material recycled is the aluminium...
^^^
Line 4, column 97, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...m the year 1982 is the glass containers.It declined in the year 1988 and had gradu...
^^
Line 4, column 173, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... gradual increase towards the year 2010.The last material which was recycled at a g...
^^^
Line 4, column 277, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...ce year 1982 is the paper and cardboard.It had spikes and lows throughout the year...
^^
Line 4, column 338, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...s throughout the year from 1989 to 2010.It was the only material which maintained ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 924.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99459459459 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57908653655 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491891891892 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 126.923095701 43.030603864 295% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 154.0 112.824112599 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.8333333333 22.9334400587 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.16666666667 5.23603664747 22% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199279030999 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12388793459 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100897848454 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14590267228 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0813538005668 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.2329268293 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.