The graph displays the proportion of old people in a country in a period between 1940 and 2040, in three different countries. We can say that the proportion is increasing with time from the change observed for USA, Japan and Sweden.
Japan is the country where the change in percentage of aged people rised very sharply. Japan had lesser proportion in 1940 comparing to USA and Sweden, however, Japan became highest in proportion by 2040 with a substantial change in the proportion. Though the curve had a slight lowering nature initially, the change after 2020 was so quick. USA could maintain a healthy proportion in comparison with other two countries and the rate of grow in proportion remained very low, or in other words, the increment is gradual, in the framed period. Thus, the proportion of aged people of USA which was highest 1940 become lowest in a span of 100 years. The rate of change of percentage of old people in Sweden shows a fluctuating nature in the mentioned period. The curve shows frequent, bu,t slight, rises and drops, but, overall growth is in between USA and Japan.
In conclusion, the percentage of aged people is increasing with time and on an average the increase is roughly 20% over 100 years. Different countries have different rate at which the proportion changes.
- Some people say that advertising encourages us to buy things we really do not need. Others say that advertisements tell us about new products that may improve our lives. Which viewpoint do you agree with? 73
- Recycling proportion from 1982 to 2010 67
- Learning english at school is often seen as more important than learning local languages. If these are not taught, many are at risk of dying out.In your opinion is it important for everyone to learn English. Should we try to ensure the survival of local l 61
- Solar energy is becoming more and more popular as a source of household energy in many countries around the world. Why is this? What are the advantages and disadvantages of solar energy? 73
- The graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of a major university in 2012. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 784, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , t
...ned period. The curve shows frequent, bu,t slight, rises and drops, but, overall g...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, thus, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1083.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87837837838 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6282268729 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4712120879 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4545454545 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1818181818 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.18181818182 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18983626818 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0824671785188 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.075449050406 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148434792238 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438639245776 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.