The graph below shows the proportion of types of magazines sold by the company in 1975, 1995 and 2015.
The bar chart illustrates the percentage of different types of magazines sold by the company in 1975, 1995, and 2015.
Overall, it is clear that sports had an upward trend and accounted for the highest proportion. On the contrary, fashion tended to decrease and was the lowest percentage in the group.
As can be seen from the bar chart, in 1975, the amount of food newspapers was only 10%. The percentage remained stable in 2015, even though it witnessed a double in 1995 with over 20%. With growth in the proportion of sports magazines, it reached its highest point of 43% at the end of the period. There was an opposite when compared between sports and food magazines with the others; in all three stages, the amount of sports newspapers was higher and food was lower.
On top of that, there was a similar trend in 1975 and 1995 with the proportion of Fashion and Neighbour Chocolate magazines. They decreased together in 1995 by 17% and 20%, respectively. While the percentage of fashion ended at 5%, neighbourly chocolate had not changed. No data in Fashion and Neighbour Chocolate could be higher than the others during the period.
- the maps show changes that took place in Felixstone from 1967 to 2001
- The chart below shows the average cost of monthly contract for four different mobile cell phones in a European country from January to September 2002 measured in euro 56
- The table below shows the number of motor vehicles per 1 000 inhabitants in eight countries in 1990 and 2000
- The charts below show the favourite takeaways of people in Canada and the number of Indian restaurants in Canada between 1960 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at leas
- The table below shows expenditures on advertising of four car companies in the UK in 2002
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, on the contrary, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 950.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82233502538 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59224419366 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553299492386 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.1454606345 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.3636363636 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9090909091 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.18181818182 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187663353813 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782052344071 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122965128478 0.0843802449381 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154536444767 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.169517246493 0.0819641961636 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.38 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, on the contrary, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 950.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82233502538 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59224419366 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553299492386 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.1454606345 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.3636363636 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9090909091 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.18181818182 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187663353813 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782052344071 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122965128478 0.0843802449381 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154536444767 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.169517246493 0.0819641961636 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.38 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.