The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Given is the chart depicting the amount of goods delivered in the UK over the 28-year period from 1974 to 2002 via four distinct means of transportation, including road, water, rail and pipeline.
From an overall perspective, road was used as the most prevalent method to ship products during the period while carrying by pipeline took responsibility the least. Furthermore, shipment by road, sea and pipeline witnessed a significant increase over 28 years while an inconsiderable fluctuation happened in the figure of rail.
As is visible in the illustration, the road was the main way for shipping goods with around 70 million tonnes transported in 1974 and continued to hold this vital role and climb to peak at nearly 100 million tonnes in 2002.
Water and rail were the second to the road in being used for carrying goods at the beginning of the period with roughly 40 million tonnes. However, transportation by sea underwent an upward trend to stand at over 60 million tonnes in the last year while delivery by rail was documented with a considerable oscillation over 28 years before reached back at the initial volume of 40 million tonnes.
Coming in last was the method of pipeline in 1974 with under 5 million tonnes but using this way for moving goods was seen to surge consecutively in the next 28 years and made up over 20 million tonnes at the end of the chart
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-12 | anhminhbnvn1 | 73 | view |
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram below shows the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The three pit charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1140.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78991596639 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.771300658 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 337.5 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.1032124574 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.857142857 112.824112599 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.0 22.9334400587 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0843096024107 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0454911570571 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045590634149 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0597414685059 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466951406845 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.2329268293 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.89 61.2550243902 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.