The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
The provided line graph indicates the number of items delivered, measured in a million tonnes, of four different categories, namely, the road, water, rail, pipeline in the United Kingdom, over a 28 years, from 1974 to 2002.
As an overall trend, it can be apparently seen that despite of fluctuating of all figures, they had increments at the end of time, except the pipeline where it increased steadily.
Between 1974 and 1978, the tendency of the water stagnated at 40 millon tonnes, whilst rail’s figure was lower slightly than it. However, in 1978, they commenced indicating a converse trend, and during the next 24 years, both oscillated, then reached peaks above 60 and 10 million tonnes, respectively.
Besides, the road’s data stood below 80 million tonnes, whereas the pipeline’s rate was lower than approximately 65 million tonnes. Afterward, the former group experienced a fluctuation throughout the periods and in 2002, was below 100 million tonnes, while the latter one had a steady rise by 1994. Henceforth, the quantities of the pipeline didn’t change until 2002.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-12 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-07-12 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-21 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-03 | Sang Sang Sang | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-03 | Sang Sang Sang | 73 | view |
- The given line graph illustrates the goods transported in the United Kingdom by four different modes of transport between the time period of 1974 and 2002. 89
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant 84
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 78
- The Graph shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The provided line graph indicates the nu...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e pipeline where it increased steadily. Between 1974 and 1978, the tendency of t...
^^^^
Line 4, column 370, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the pipeline didn’t change until 2002.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, besides, hence, however, if, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 920.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25714285714 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77271840383 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.685714285714 0.547539520022 125% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5755492601 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.428571429 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116375695445 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0570614755461 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493694987484 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.066765942637 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0528359141441 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.