The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
The line graph illustrates the number of goods which were delivered by 4 different means of transport namely road, water, rail, and pipeline in Britain over a period of 28 years between 1974 and 2002.
Overall, it is clear that road was the most popular way to transport goods; whereas pipeline was the least popular one. Units are measured in million tonnes.
In 1974, only about 5 million tonnes of products were transported by pipeline compared to nearly 70 million tonnes delivered by road. The figure for road transportation then increased gradually and reached approximately 100 million tonnes in 2002 despite a small drop of around 2 million tonnes in 1996. Meanwhile, the number of goods carried by pipeline only witnessed a slight increase of 19 million tonnes throughout the period surveyed.
Both water and rail carried the same amount of freight during the first 4 years, 40 million tonnes. Then the former rose dramatically to 60 million tonnes in the middle years and fell to 50 million tonnes in 1998 before surging up to around 60 million tonnes in the end. However, the latter experienced a fluctuation of under 40 milllion tonnes during the time shown and finally reached the same amount of freight as in 1974 in the final year.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-02-25 | huathibichngoc.c3.ltt@gmail.com | 73 | view |
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity 87
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by governments rather than private companies. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014. 73
- The line graph shows the cost for watching films. The pie charts show the change in the percentage of market share represented by the three forms. 78
- Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of the old houses in the local areas while others think that people should have the freedom to build houses of their own styles Discuss both views and give your own opinion 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...east popular one. Units are measured in million tonnes. In 1974, only about 5 millio...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1046.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93396226415 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56638454926 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566037735849 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0573984352 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.222222222 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139048171529 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063821419001 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0801260870618 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110060163606 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0967045419093 0.0819641961636 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.