The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.

The line graph illustrates the proportion of goods which were transported in the UK from 1974 to 2002 by four separate modes of transport.

Overall,the figure for goods transported by road, water and pipeline all increased over a period of time, except for the quantity of products conveyed by rail which remained almost constant at about 40 million tonnes. Moreover, goods transported by road accounted for the highest point while the transport of products by pipeline was the lowest.

As it presented in the graph, in 1974, goods transported by road made up 70 million tonnes compared to only about 5 million tonnes of products conveyed by pipeline. From 1974 to 1978, both of them increased slightly to 75 millions and approximately 7 millions respectively. From 1974, the transport of products by road went up moderately to nearly 100 by 2002 after fluctuating between 70 millions and 80 millions over a period of 20 years. Beside, between 1978 and 1982, there was a moderate growth of million tonnes of goods which were conveyed by pipeline. 16 years later, it remained constant. After that, it continued rising and reached above 20 million tonnes in 2002.

The graph shows clearly that, over a period of 4 years, the figure for products transferred by rail leveled out at 40 millions. On the other hand, the tonnes of goods conveyed by water rose sightly from 38 millions to 40 millions. Throughout the rest of the period, both of them fluctuated, however, rail transport always accounted for higher million tonnes of products than water. By 2002, rail transport reached at about 63 million tonnes compared to 41 million tonnes of water transport 's goods.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-30 leanhtu11 89 view
2020-01-21 PsycRicky 56 view
2020-01-16 Raksadil 73 view
2020-01-16 Adilrahi 73 view
2020-01-12 kaka singh 78 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... transported in the UK from 1974 to 2002 by four separate modes of transport. ...
^^
Line 5, column 9, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...arate modes of transport. Overall,the figure for goods transported by road, w...
^^^^
Line 5, column 92, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...water and pipeline all increased over a period of time, except for the quantity of products co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 345, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...l transport always accounted for higher million tonnes of products than water. By 2002,...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover, while, except for, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 33.7804878049 192% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1398.0 965.302439024 145% => OK
No of words: 279.0 196.424390244 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01075268817 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70284169348 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47311827957 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 382.5 283.868780488 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5628668341 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.538461538 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4615384615 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.23076923077 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284795255232 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119438482544 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118758320868 0.0843802449381 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237038427895 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142524572941 0.0819641961636 174% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.