The graph below shows the rates of Smoking in Malaysia by men and women. Write areport, discussing the information shown below.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the rates of Smoking in Malaysia by men and women. Write a
report, discussing the information shown below.

The graph shows the trends of smoking in Malaysia for both men and women in the period from 2000-2009 . As we can note from the graph in 2000, only 100 in 1000 women were active smokers while in the same year there were 600 men smokers in every 1000.

The situation with smokers between women started to change in 2001 when a slight rise happened and by 2005 we can concern that figure has risen to the total number of 300 women being active smokers in the group of 1000. After 2005, the trend of rising has constantly started to fall and finally reached the level of 200 women as active smokers in 2009.

Comparing the information from the graph we can observe that men were more regular smokers than women for the whole period of 2000-2009. In 2000 there were 600 men in every 1000 included in the smoking activity. After 2000, the graph shows a dramatic decline in the number of men who were active smokers and by 2005 the level has fallen to 400 men. Lastly, in 2009 there were only 250 men in every 1000 to be part of the smoking community.

Taking a look at both trends, it is evident that men were more active smokers than women for the whole period 2000-2009. However, the level of women becoming smokers has risen over the years while the same could not be said for the men. On the contrary, the men marked a significant drop in the rate of active smokers following the graph information.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2016-08-16 Tamara 73 view
Essays by user Tamara :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...n and women in the period from 2000-2009 . As we can note from the graph in 2000, ...
^^

Discourse Markers used:
['finally', 'however', 'if', 'lastly', 'look', 'while', 'on the contrary']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.223826714801 0.268076937826 83% => OK
Verbs: 0.13357400722 0.116061578633 115% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0794223826715 0.0759168565197 105% => OK
Adverbs: 0.028880866426 0.0366838410393 79% => OK
Pronouns: 0.014440433213 0.0131127313244 110% => OK
Prepositions: 0.184115523466 0.155750635184 118% => OK
Participles: 0.043321299639 0.0379272487307 114% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.09604798604 2.65546596893 79% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0180505415162 0.0210936926555 86% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.129963898917 0.0948980150116 137% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.014440433213 0.00437022459523 330% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0072202166065 0.00967000014798 75% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1405.0 1161.00487805 121% => OK
No of words: 260.0 196.9 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40384615385 5.90752243213 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.73763899035 107% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.242307692308 0.337110787985 72% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.169230769231 0.247514529752 68% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.0730769230769 0.171178102325 43% => More words length more than 7 chars wanted.
words length more than 8 chars: 0.05 0.112407865282 44% => More words length more than 8 chars wanted.
Word Length SD: 2.09604798604 2.65546596893 79% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.442307692308 0.546246751206 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 40.6221675484 49.3433353143 82% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 8.93414634146 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.6363636364 23.0094962315 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.792330311 42.9750493124 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.727272727 135.714022679 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6363636364 23.0094962315 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.636363636364 0.689975730869 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.48048780488 68% => OK
Readability: 40.5594405594 47.7609492067 85% => OK
Elegance: 2.55102040816 2.94281807926 87% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.482780683236 0.418131533498 115% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.194450242029 0.181151798455 107% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0774360464657 0.0850326197045 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.733172687665 0.706616315825 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0920390432125 0.157042692854 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.293658573485 0.228904883108 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104591086518 0.108899403657 96% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.493900554864 0.367819155151 134% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0736926478907 0.0812612215331 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.385079637667 0.316326947829 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048482491322 0.0921553760075 53% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70731707317 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.14146341463 0% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.08536585366 122% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 3.16585365854 190% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 0.956097560976 0% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 3.02926829268 165% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 7.1512195122 154% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.