The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The line graph gives information about how the relative prices for 3 types of food had changed from 1978 to 2009 and the trend for the average consumer pricing during the same period.
Overall, it is evident that over the 31-year period, prices for 3 types of food surveyed all showed an upward trend, albeit with varying degrees. It is also readily apparent that the most prominent rise was seen in fruits and vegetables sector, while carbonated drinks had the least changes in prices, with figures lower than the average consumer pricing for all of the timeframe.
In 1979, all the lines on the graph had the same starting figure of roughly 50. Over the period, the consumer pricing rose steadily to the mark 200, four times higher than its starting figure. Carbonated drinks generally matched this rising trend although less significant, remaining the only type of food whose relative price had always been lower than the consumer pricing.
In sheer contrast, sugar and sweets and fruits and vegetables had surpassed the average consumer pricing since around 1980. The latter experienced more considerable climb than the former, ending the period at a slightly higher figure than the former, which was 300 at the same time. Both of these types of food had many fluctuations in their relative prices.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-22 | bemoichoianhyeuem | view | |
| 2023-08-22 | bemoichoianhyeuem | view | |
| 2022-03-29 | Blackcytrus | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-07 | yanping | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-28 | madina6369 | view |
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 73
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment 73
- The map below show the center of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development 73
- The graph shows the percentage of female members of Parliament in European countries between 2000 and 2012 87
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 359, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...r than the average consumer pricing for all of the timeframe. In 1979, all the lines on t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1088.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99082568807 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33020298956 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582568807339 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 325.8 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1146303415 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.888888889 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2222222222 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201833877545 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.08678823574 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0641725549901 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139924494568 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517693644202 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.