The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph gives information about the prices of three different foods and drinks over a period of 40 years, starting from 1979.
Overall, every category witnessed upward trends throughout the years. Moreover, the cost of fresh fruits and vegetables increased the most significantly among the given items.
In 1979, all of the prices’ growth rate stood at 50%. After six years, although the charge for fresh fruits and vegetables fluctuated, the three of them climbed gradually by approximately 100%. Then, people had to pay much more for fresh fruits and vegetables as its prices rose sharply and reached the highest point of the graph at approximately 325% in 2008, finishing at well under that one year later.
On the other hand, the other two aspects went up moderately. Sugar and sweet’s prices ended up being four times higher than in 1979 with 200%, compared to only more than 150% falling into the figures for that of carbonated drinks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-22 | bemoichoianhyeuem | view | |
| 2023-08-22 | bemoichoianhyeuem | view | |
| 2022-03-29 | Blackcytrus | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-07 | yanping | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-28 | madina6369 | view |
- It was observed that in some countries not enough students are choosing to study science subjects at university What are the cases What effects does this have 89
- The pie charts below show a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in two years
- As well as making money businesses have social responsibilities Do you agree or disagree 84
- The bar chart shows the scores of teams A B and C over four different seasons Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- In many countries people like to eat a wider variety of food than can be grown in the local area As a result much of the food today we eat has to come from other regions Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...tly among the given items. In 1979, all of the prices’ growth rate stood at 50%. After...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, then, well, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 799.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05696202532 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51444313735 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.696202531646 0.547539520022 127% => OK
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.293492664 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.875 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199531334228 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.071483782777 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475129469187 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102880678455 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0279873974554 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.