The line graph given reveals some information with regard to the amount of dollars spent by four diverse country on investigation of a renewable source of energy between 1975 and 2000.
As can be seen there were two general trends upward and downwars. With regard to the first, the numbers for Denmark experience a slight escalation to $1 in 1980, where remained steady for 10 years.This plateau was short lived; however, as the next decade brought an exponentially growth to approximately 7.5 dollars. Switzerland also witnessed a steep escalation, rising erratically to $5 during this period.
The trends for UK and Spain; however, were downward, albert by varying degrees, with the figures for the former climbed, rising to the 1 mark in 1980. This climb was followed by a slight decline, albeit fitfully to about 0.5 in 2000. Turning to Spain, the figures went up, rising to just above $1; and subsequently there was a deep in 1985 to approximately 0.5 and then Bouncing Back in 1990. the numbers, next, decline to just above $0 in 2000.
It is worth mentioning that, the amount dollers spent by Spain was more than that of other three countries put together in 2000.
- The pie charts below show the online sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The diagram below shows the production of electricity using a system called Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC).Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below. 86
- The graph below shows the spending on research into renewable sources of energy in four countries between 1975 to 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received fromemployers.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write 73
- Scientists agree that people are damaging their health by eating too much junk food. Some people think that the answer to this problem is to educate people. Others think education will not work.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rce of energy between 1975 and 2000. As can be seen there were two general tr...
^^^
Line 3, column 153, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...enmark experience a slight escalation to in 1980, where remained steady for 10 ye...
^^
Line 3, column 199, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...980, where remained steady for 10 years.This plateau was short lived; however, as th...
^^^^
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('exponentially') instead an adjective, or a noun ('growth') instead of another adjective.
...ed; however, as the next decade brought an exponentially growth to approximately 7.5 dollars. Switzerla...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 387, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... steep escalation, rising erratically to during this period. The trends for UK...
^^
Line 5, column 392, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ely 0.5 and then Bouncing Back in 1990. the numbers, next, decline to just above sh...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, so, then, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 973.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93908629442 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67358778149 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654822335025 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.8011106879 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.111111111 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122281878504 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0485764680431 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.087305194358 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0960442882575 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112523896942 0.0819641961636 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.