The graph below shows the total revenue of three pizza places in Vietnam. The figures were taken in 2017.
The statistical line chart illustrates monthly revenue of three pizza brands in Vietnam of the year 2017 namely Pizza Hut, Domino Pizza and The Pizza Company.
Overall, total revenue of three places experienced fluctuation throughout the months. It is also worth mentioning that monthly revenue of The Pizza Company had an upward trend and was the most popular choice of Vietnamese consumers.
As indicated in the chart, The Pizza Company and Domino Pizza followed a quite similar sales pattern as their starting points were around $35 million and $30 million respectively. After that, these figures fell dramatically to under $15 million one month later. From February to July, these two pizza brands underwent a fluctuation in which The Pizza Company’s sales peaking over $40 million. Subsequently, both companies witnessed a slight increase to $35 and $34 million in December accordingly.
Another considerable feature is Pizza Hut which generated roughly $14 million in January. Then, the sales of this brand dropped drastically to $6 million in February before recovering to approximately $14 million in June. From this milestone to the end of the period, a loss of around $10 million was reported in the sales of Pizza Hut.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-27 | nguyen thanh sang | 89 | view |
| 2021-01-19 | minhhg | 67 | view |
- Most people are not interested in how their food has been produced They only care about how much it costs How true is this statement What influences people when they buy food 84
- more and more people want to buy clothes cars and other products from well known brands what are the reasons do you think it is a positive or negative development 89
- The graph below shows the total revenue of three pizza places in Vietnam The figures were taken in 2017 89
- We cannot help everyone in the world that needs help so we should only be concerned with our own communities and countries To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- The chart below gives information about car ownership in the UK from 1975 to 2005 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 141, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...les of this brand dropped drastically to million in February before recovering to...
^^
Line 4, column 143, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...s of this brand dropped drastically to million in February before recovering to approx...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1018.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19387755102 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8703049598 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581632653061 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.2296333632 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.8 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.7 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213222252893 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0873926438148 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0870849879442 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149170596738 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0890992008959 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.