The graph below shows trends in US meat and poultry consumption.
The line graph demonstrates the meat and poultry consumption in US from 1955 to 2012. Its measured unit was pounds. Overall, beef got the highest usage in the united State among four brands of meats whereas the turkey consumming was small. There had been a remain constant in the consumption of pork and turkey while eating beef and broilers increased.
It was immediately obvious that the amount of beef eaten rose considerably before reaching a peak to 90 pounds in 1979 and then fell slightly to 50 pounds in 2012. The consumption of broilers experienced a significant rise from 1961 to 2009, followed by a slight decrease during its period time to 2012. There was stability in the consumtion of pork after flutuating between 1995 and 2000. On the other hand, the number of turkey stayed unchanged over the course of 51 years starting from 1961.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-22 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | trinhthanh1 | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-07 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows trends in US meat and poultry consumption. 56
- The graph below shows trends in US meat and poultry consumption. 56
- The graph below shows trends in US meat and poultry consumption. 56
- The graph below shows trends in US meat and poultry consumption. 56
- The graph below shows trends in US meat and poultry consumption. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 257, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ey consumming was small. There had been a remain constant in the consumption of pork and...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e eating beef and broilers increased. It was immediately obvious that the amou...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 708.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 146.0 196.424390244 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84931506849 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.47606760199 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59956547605 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.650684931507 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 196.2 283.868780488 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.8648913903 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0826848585325 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0422679299258 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0953401740342 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0718181787438 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0718181787438 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.