The graph below shows UK acid rain emissions, measured in millions of tones, from four sectors between 1990 and 2007
The line graph compares four different means in the UK regarding the amount of acid rain emissions that they caused over a period of 16 years, commencing from 1991. Units are measured in millions of tonnes.
In general, there was a downward tendency in the total level of acid rain in the UK over the given period. Additionally, electricity, gas and water supply and domestic sectors respectively emitted more acid rain in comparison with transport and communication and other industries, and electricity, gas and water supply witnessed the most dramatic decline between 1991 and 2007
In 1990, while 3.3 million tonnes of acid rain emissions came from electricity, gas and water supply, just over 2 million was responsible by domestic means. Thereafter, the former decreased steadily to 0.5 in 2007 and being surpassed by the latter, approximately 1.3
The figure of acid rain emissions from transport ad communication means started at around 0.7 in the initial year, after which it dropped marginally over the period shown, with a slight increase to 1 in 2005. That of other industries began at around the same level, 0.6, however experienced a gradual fall by 0.3 during the mentioned period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-01 | Phạm Minh Hân | 84 | view |
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish in a city of Japa between 1980 and 2015 87
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish in a city of Japan between 1980 and 2015 84
- The graph below shows the power generation capacity in Germany from 2008 to 2014 78
- The graph below shows carbon dioxide emissions per capita in four countries from 1975 to 2010 78
- The graph below shows carbon dioxide emissions per capita in four countries from 1975 to 2010 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, so, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1003.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11734693878 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83700538277 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59693877551 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 132.732081863 43.030603864 308% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 167.166666667 112.824112599 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.6666666667 22.9334400587 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321921844917 0.215688989381 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141901604972 0.103423049105 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0773755135202 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191378867138 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0783831010346 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.2329268293 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.01 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, so, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1003.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11734693878 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83700538277 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59693877551 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 132.732081863 43.030603864 308% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 167.166666667 112.824112599 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.6666666667 22.9334400587 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321921844917 0.215688989381 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141901604972 0.103423049105 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0773755135202 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191378867138 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0783831010346 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.2329268293 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.01 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.