The graph below shows UK air pollutants in millions of tonnes, from three different sources, between 1990 and 2005.
The line chart compares the number of emissions released into the air from three different sources from 1990 to 2005.
Looking at the graph, it is immediately obvious that the industrial zones and households discharging pollutants to the environment decreased over the period shown, while the opposite was true for transport. Additionally, the sum number of air pollutants gradually declined year by year.
In 1990, a total of nearly 8 million tonnes of air contaminants were emitted from the three mentioned causes, with the largest figure belonging to the industry, at around 6 million tonnes. 2 million tonnes of pollutants remaining were divided equally for transport and households.
Over the fifteen years ensuing, a downward trend happened in the amount of emissions were produced by industry, only by about a third of the original. By contrast, the figures for transport and households stayed relatively unchanged during the first nine years. However, in the last six years, the quantity of air contaminants sending to the atmosphere from families fell to a negligible amount, whilst the reverse was true for transport, that increased to approximately 3 million tonnes. Due to decreasing more than increasing, so the whole of pollutants discharged into the air also went down to roughly 5 million tonnes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-03 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 89 | view |
| 2020-03-03 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 89 | view |
- The world of work is rapidly changing and employees cannot depend on having the same job or the same working conditions for life Why is it the case Can you suggest some ways to prepare people to work in the future 95
- The only way to improve safety of our roads is to give much stricter punishments for driving offences What extent do you agree or disagree 78
- In many cities there is little control on the design and construction of new houses so people can build houses in their own style rather than building them with the same style or the old houses in the local area Do advantages outweigh dissdvantages 89
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 89
- Solving environmental problems should be the responsibility of one international organisation rather than each national government Do you agree or disagree 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, look, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1107.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2966507177 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92898010836 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607655502392 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 328.5 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9401246675 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2222222222 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265214317595 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106847989907 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0878070458698 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17814026661 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0851553453088 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.