Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. Do you
think it is a positive or negative development?
In many places, commercial centers are gradually supplanting local stores. In my perspective, this change brings about both advantage and disadvantage, this essay will discuss both points of view.
On the one hand, there is no doubt that small shops can bring a wide range of benefit to communities. For example, family-run businesses are likely to provide goods with competitive prices because they do not have to spend much money on taxes and rental fees. In addition, more locally-owned small businesses are better for local economies and communities by supplying more employments, profits and income to local residents.
On the other hand, the boom in the number of shopping malls has offered customers a multitude of conveniences. First of all, people can save time shopping thanks to the availability of many types of stores located in a mall. It provides groceries, clothing, books, foods and entertainment facilities that can meet the needs of people of all ages under the one roof instead of in separate smaller stores.
Furthermore, the architecture and promotions of depots are other factors that attract buyers. Designers usually use strong light systems which help different items becoming more lively and this will stimulate people's shopping needs. Besides, most large malls provide customers with convenient and secure parking facilities makes people feel safe and enjoy shopping time. Discounts and promotions are also regularly offered, which is a strength of trade centers compared to small stores. As a result, more and more citizens are choosing to shop in large shopping malls, leading to a decrease in the number of people purchasing goods from small shops.
In conclusion, the proliferation of shopping malls could have positive effects on customers but it is likely to push small local businesses to the brink of bankruptcy and this is bad for the local economies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-11 | rajpatel90 | 73 | view |
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in 4 countries in 1950 and 2003 and projections for 2050 95
- The table shows the amount of money given to developing countries by the USA EU countries and other countries from 2006 to 2010 Figures are in millions of dollars 78
- The charts below show the percentage of people aged 23 65 in di erent occupations in one UK town Ashby and in the UK as a whole in 2008 78
- The line graph shows three different crimes in England and Wales in 1970-2005. 73
- The table below presents the food consumption per a person weekly in a European country in 1992 2002 and 2012 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, if, so, for example, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1599.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29470198675 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81866667122 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58940397351 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3343360787 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.214285714 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2142857143 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236222306505 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0788160867764 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717075073992 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120298979652 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0711105826879 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.