The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the US and Japan between March 1993 and March 1999.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.
The graph illustrates the population of unemployment in the US and Japan from March 1993 to march 1999. The quantification is measured from 2.0 to 7.5 per cent. In General, in March 1993, US may lead the start but at the end, March 1999, both landed on the same road.
At first start, March 1993, Japan's unemployment started at 2,5%. Contrastively, US began at 7.0% in given time. However, its unemployment rates always decreased gradually 5 points in every year, 6.5 in between 93 and 94, 6.0 in the length of 94 and 95, 5,5 from 96 to 97, and stopped at 5.0% in March 1998. Despite that US' declination, Japan's jobless populations increased collectively five points in every year, 3.0% in 1993, 3.5 in 1994, 4.0 in 1995, 4.5 in 1996 and 1997. As result, Japan could overtake US' rates.
Both had the same ground at the end of two years. Between March 1998 and 1999, both similarly spotted at five%.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-05-16 | Thu Phung | 73 | view |
2017-03-01 | Jamalin | 73 | view |
2016-02-11 | desiayukusuma | 60 | view |
2014-07-09 | davebeckham | 80 | view |
2014-06-02 | via oktaria | 60 | view |
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 80
- Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplace. Others think that the true function of a university should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake, regardless of whether the cours 78
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparis 89
- The charts below show the proportion of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparis 96
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparis 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 517, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... result, Japan could overtake US rates. Both had the same ground at the end of t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, similarly, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 741.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57407407407 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62499591743 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.617283950617 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 188.1 283.868780488 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.8370927572 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.1 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287316869583 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125607405408 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111840520134 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205052187206 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0916623771131 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 13.2329268293 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 89.08 61.2550243902 145% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.8 10.3012195122 47% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.93 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.06 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.