The graph below shows US consumers' average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services between 2001 and 2010.
The line graph gives information about how much money consumers in the United States spent on both cell phone and residential phone services during the 10-year period from 2001 to 2010.
Overall, there was a general upward trend in the average expenditure on cell phone services by American people, whereas the annual spending on residential phone services experienced a reverse pattern over the given years.
$700 was paid for residential phone services in the US in the first year. After that, the money used for these services showed a constant decrease to around $500 in 2007 before continuing to fall noticeably to hit its lowest point of just over $400.
In comparison, American consumers allocated $200 to cell phone services, which was much lower than that of residential ones at the beginning of the decade. Afterward, it can be seen that Americans spent more on using cell phone. Specifically, there was a steep rise in the annual spending throughout the years, exceeding the figure for residential ones and peaking at approximately $750.
- The graphs below give information about the performance of the trains in a train company in October and November in 2008 78
- Many young people who leave school hold a negative attitude towards learning Why does this happen What are the solutions 89
- The chart below shows the percentage of total US population aged 65 and over between 1900 and 2000 78
- The table illustrates the percentage of male and female in terms of weight in Vietnam from 1999 to 2009 79
- The picture below shows how a hot balloon works 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 184, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ring the 10year period from 2001 to 2010 Overall there was a general upward trend...
^^^
Line 2, column 219, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d a reverse pattern over the given years 700 was paid for residential phone servi...
^^^
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to hit its lowest point of just over 400 In comparison American consumers allocat...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 861.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00581395349 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65092690709 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598837209302 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 172.0 22.4926829268 765% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 861.0 112.824112599 763% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 172.0 22.9334400587 750% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 22.0 5.23603664747 420% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.439297370796 0.215688989381 204% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.439297370796 0.103423049105 425% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263255994325 0.15604864568 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0776566605357 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 88.2 13.2329268293 667% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -103.1 61.2550243902 -168% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 70.4 10.3012195122 683% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.96 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 15.38 8.06136585366 191% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 59.0 11.4329268293 516% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 70.8 10.9970731707 644% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.