The bar chart shows the production of coffee in 4 nations between 1990 and 2010.
Overall it can be seen that for all figures the overall trend was upward, except for Colombia. In addition the figure for Brazil was the highest over the course of 20 years.
Turning to the chat for more detail, from 1990 to 2005, The amount of coffee produced started at about 0.6 million tonnes, then it continued climbing 1 million tonnes in 1995. Which were higher than the other countries . That in Colombia was closed to 0.6 million tonnes, it dropped minimally to nearly 0.5 million tonnes in the last year. There were periods of stability in the number of coffee output in Indonesia and Vietnam at about 0.2 and 0.1 million tonnes respectively.
Regarding the other nations, between 2000 to 2010, there was a dramatic growth to reach a peak of 1.9 million tonnes in the coffee output of Brazil. By contrast, that in Colombia decreased minimally to end at 0.3 million tonnes. The figure for Indonesia saw a slight rise to finish at 0.4 million tonnes. The coffee production in VietNam climbed slightly to hit the lowest figure at nealy 0.3 million tonnes in 2010.
- More people put their personal information online e q address telephone number for everyday activities such as socializing on social networks or banking purposes is this positive or negative development 84
- The diagram below shows the production of ethanol oil from grain Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- Some people think that the best way to increase road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving cars or riding motorbikes To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The graph gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 1990 to 2010 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 98, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...end was upward, except for Colombia. In addition the figure for Brazil was the highest o...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 176, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nued climbing 1 million tonnes in 1995. Which were higher than the other countries . ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 218, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ich were higher than the other countries . That in Colombia was closed to 0.6 mill...
^^
Line 4, column 29, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pectively. Regarding the other nations, between 2000 to 2010, there was a dramat...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, then, except for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 957.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73762376238 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34386493466 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539603960396 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.7009356514 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3636363636 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.63636363636 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160575555464 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713135369091 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798715708641 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120837918669 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0910504395219 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.