The bar chart compares the consumption of ground and public water supply in different industries every year in Somecountry.
It can be clearly seen that the lowest rate in ground water usage are recorded in machinery (10 million of cubic meters) followed by fuel (70 million of cubic meters). The next three sectors have higher rates, usage of ground water in textiles totals 80 million of cubic meters, while food/drinks and paper have 110 and 190 million of cubic meters respectively. The highest numbers belong to the metal and chemical industries, at 240 and 430 million of cubic meters respectively.
Public water supply consumption are lesser in all sectors; the highest numbers are reported in chemical (240 million of cubic meters) and the lowest in both textiles and fuel. Public water supply usage in paper totals 20 million of cubic meters. Three other industries have much higher rates, starting with metal (90) and progressing through machinery (100) to food/drinks (190).
To sum up, the report demonstrates that fuel and textiles have identical consumption in both ground and public water supply.
- The graph on the right describes average house prices in Sometown in 2005. 55
- The graph on the right gives information on wages of Somecountry over a ten-year period. 73
- The graph on the right shows the way people of Somecountry invested their money during the year 2001-2006. 67
- The graph on the right shows how prices of high-tech gadgets changed over time in Somecountry. 33
- The graph on the right shows annual water usage (in millions of cubic meters) by industry in Somecountry. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 929.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16111111111 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59849790418 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477777777778 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3848783837 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.125 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325253311828 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160107373826 0.103423049105 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0822554865342 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183872495473 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102373490487 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.